.png)
1 hour ago
1
The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) has fundamentally shifted its security doctrine from a territorial to a sector-based architecture. The reform aims to strengthen strategic deterrence through function- and installation-specific supervision and security, enhanced field monitoring, and improved coordination with client organisations.
Ahead of the reorganisation, which will take effect on November 1, CISF Director General Praveer Ranjan has called for a coordinated transition at all levels of the central armed police force. He has emphasised the need to identify potential challenges in advance and take the necessary administrative measures without disrupting day-to-day operations, sources in the force told businessline.
The move aims to introduce domain specialisation, moving away from the existing generalist approach to address diverse security requirements and challenges.
For instance, the Eastern Sector Inspector General (IG) currently oversees 60 units spanning the coal, power, mining and steel sectors. “It is practically very difficult to gain an in-depth understanding of all these sectors while also engaging with different ministries. Coordinating with so many entities while providing security poses a major challenge,” officials familiar with the ongoing transition said.
Sector Specialisation
The 11 CISF sectors will now provide dedicated security to specific strategic installations and regions. For instance, the Delhi-NCR sector will cover government buildings, museums, and Parliament; the Eastern sector will oversee coal installations, and the Central sector will focus on steel facilities.
CISF officials clarified that the reorganisation would not affect the deployment of personnel currently providing security at various units. They will continue to perform their duties as usual, with changes limited to the supervisory level.
A new posting policy is being formulated in this regard and is currently under consideration, officials emphasised.
Operational Efficiency
The reorganisation is expected to ensure clear accountability, specialised supervision and faster resolution of operational and administrative issues. “Function-specific supervision will strengthen understanding of installation-specific security requirements, enhance field monitoring, speed up decision-making, and improve coordination with client organisations, thereby making CISF security services more effective and responsive,” sources said.
The reorganisation will also help safeguard the country’s economic security, which is becoming increasingly important as critical assets grow more vulnerable during modern conflicts. The functional restructuring will create specialised verticals within the Force to protect entire production processes.
The atomic energy sector, established on a functional basis in 2018, provides an example. The CISF secures the entire production chain, from uranium mines and fuel enrichment and bundling plants to reactors and waste management facilities, sources explained.
Similarly, CISF units deployed in the petroleum and natural gas sector, covering the entire chain from exploration and pipelines to refineries and chemical and fertiliser units processing by-products, have been aligned to integrate the Force’s security architecture with industrial and economic processes, inherent vulnerabilities, potential threats and the relevant regulatory framework, sources said.
The reorganisation is expected to strengthen the security of India’s critical economic assets. Port security is crucial to safeguarding the country’s coastline, which stretches over 7,000 km.
The qualitative shift will require customised deployment patterns, training and procedures, including standardised standard operating procedures (SOPs), along with better coordination with the respective ministries and departments. Leadership structures will also need to be aligned with the specific requirements of each sector.
The CISF had earlier attempted to adapt its security structure to meet the specific needs of the airport sector. Over the past 25 years, five of its 11 sectors, accounting for about half of the combined sanctioned personnel strength deployed across these domains, had already been functionally aligned.
The benefits of the reform, coupled with growing national security challenges, prompted a review of the supervisory command structure of the remaining six territorial sectors, officials said.
The revised structure was designed based on recommendations from an internal committee and consultations with field formations.
Published on October 27, 2026
English (US) ·